branch: master 「№58596」
Commited by: Andrew Watkins
GitHub commit link: 「7f35c293a15a5be7」 「№1229」
Difference from previous tested commit:  code diff
Commit date: 2016-04-01 06:21:21

Merge pull request #1229 from RosettaCommons/everyday847/cleanup Trivial, semantic-neutral code cleanup effort to core/scoring: I think it makes sense to move forward with this PR: even the scorefile scores, in that one integration test that appears to just get optimized differently, end up the same.

...


branch: master 「№58595」
Commited by: Andrew Watkins
GitHub commit link: 「0cae3092782a6dfc」 「№1148」
Difference from previous tested commit:  code diff
Commit date: 2016-03-31 21:07:58

Merge pull request #1148 from RosettaCommons/everyday847/dunbrack_cleanup Clean up core/pack/dunbrack - If I want to do more work on this, I'll do it in a separate PR. May as well get things looking better asap.

...


branch: master 「№58594」
Commited by: Rocco Moretti
GitHub commit link: 「4481504a3774db21」 「№1236」
Difference from previous tested commit:  code diff
Commit date: 2016-03-31 12:44:27

Merge pull request #1236 from RosettaCommons/roccomoretti/silenttagfile Add support for -in:file:tagfile to SilentFileInputter. he relationship between -in:file:tags and -in:file:tagfile is similar to -in:file:s and -in:file:l -- that is, you can now pass a file with a list of tags, rather than having to list all the tags out on the commandline (and without the length limits doing so imposes). The -in:file:tagfile is a pre-existing flag, only used once in AbrelaxApplication.cc, but with similar semantics. This extends the functionality to JD2 protocols. (Also fixes the option file description.)

...


branch: master 「№58593」
Commited by: Labonte
GitHub commit link: 「c1e8713c5934f993」 「№1211」
Difference from previous tested commit:  code diff
Commit date: 2016-03-31 10:26:56

Merge pull request #1211 from RosettaCommons/JWLabonte/XRW/HETNAM_records Post-XRW: Refactoring reading, writing, and storage of HETNAM records This merge completes a task having been on my to-do list for a long time — a refactoring of `HETNAM` code in Rosetta to be more general / less carbohydrate-centric. Now anyone should be able to specify using `HETNAM` records the desired base `ResidueType` for a specific three-letter-code at a specific position in the structure. (This was currently only functional for three-letter-codes that are listed in the database as carbohydrate codes.) A clear example is now found in `source/test/core/import_pose/3-letter_code_ambiguity_resolution.cxxtest.hh ` Now, Rosetta-format `HETNAM` records are output by default for all non-AA, non-AA, non-virtual, and non-membrane residues. This will change ~50 integration tests. There is a known issue with `HETNAM` records involved in branched complexes being sorted poorly. I will fix this in a later merge, and it currently only affects sugars. A flag, `use_pdb_format_HETNAM_records`, can be used to have the Rosetta output PDB-format HETNAM records instead, but for this to be truly useful, we need to have the PDB name for each 3-letter code stored somewhere in Rosetta. (Perhaps a future pull request?) This merge also cleans up / simplifies `SFR` code that was a mess because about six of us were working on it at the same time during the ChemicalXRW. (As an extra bonus, it also introduces the (`molfile_to_param.py`-generated) oxidized and reduced versions of flavin into the database.) All unit tests pass. Windows PyRosetta test not completed. (See Sergey's e-mail.) ~50 integration test changes from `HETNAM` records in output files carbohydrates test change from new sorting of `HETNAM` records. number_of_residuetypes test change from adding two more

...


branch: master 「№58592」
Commited by: Andrew Leaver-Fay
GitHub commit link: 「a61ddd9803e1c848」
Difference from previous tested commit:  code diff
Commit date: 2016-03-30 12:16:49

Reverting 6b05687a3e in master to 3501c41d per David Johnson's request

...


branch: master 「№58591」
Commited by: David Johnson
GitHub commit link: 「6b05687a3e7f2a06」
Difference from previous tested commit:  code diff
Commit date: 2016-03-30 09:35:08

Trying to merge RRM DNP app changes, having troubles

...


branch: master 「№58590」
Commited by: Vikram K. Mulligan
GitHub commit link: 「3501c41d2d7c010c」 「№1232」
Difference from previous tested commit:  code diff
Commit date: 2016-03-29 03:13:35

Merge pull request #1232 from RosettaCommons/vmullig/symmgly_uninit Fixing a beta_nov15 issue with symmetric glycine Ramachandran tables Fixing an issue with symmetric glycine Ramachandran tables and the Shapovalov option: if the option is true (as it is for beta_nov15), then only the data for ss=3 have been loaded, in which case we should only symmetrize those tables (since everything else is uninitialized).

...


branch: master 「№58589」
Commited by: Vikram K. Mulligan
GitHub commit link: 「686658231f7cf9fb」 「№1231」
Difference from previous tested commit:  code diff
Commit date: 2016-03-29 02:20:48

Merge pull request #1231 from RosettaCommons/vmullig/minimizer_uninit Fixing major uninitialized variable issue unique to lbfgs minimization This illustrates why, when we change a convention or a Rosetta default behaviour, we REALLY need to make sure that we test the effects of the change very carefully. The switch to lbfgs as default caused a whole host of new Valgrind errors which were previously not revealed because tests were previously not invoking the lbfgs code. This, at least, should fix those issues. Very minor trajectory changes observed (and expected) in those integration tests that were throwing Valgrind errors. These are probably associated with the first line minimization during the lbfgs minimization trajectory.

...


branch: master 「№58588」
Commited by: Vikram K. Mulligan
GitHub commit link: 「5b4413a0f6a898fd」 「№1234」
Difference from previous tested commit:  code diff
Commit date: 2016-03-28 22:39:38

Merge pull request #1234 from RosettaCommons/vmullig/hg_issue Small bug in simple_cycpep_predict fixed Disulfides were not being properly rebuilt following cyclic depermutation.

...


branch: master 「№58587」
Commited by: Hahnbeom Park
GitHub commit link: 「a74837096714a75f」 「№1233」
Difference from previous tested commit:  code diff
Commit date: 2016-03-28 20:21:27

Merge pull request #1233 from RosettaCommons/hahnbeom/shapovalov_dun_fix Fixing precision issue with Maxim's library for typical machines (old…

...


branch: master 「№58586」
Commited by: Tom Linsky
GitHub commit link: 「2288d439b11e82e7」 「№1226」
Difference from previous tested commit:  code diff
Commit date: 2016-03-28 18:56:18

Merge pull request #1226 from RosettaCommons/tlinsky/matchermover_bug Fix bug where matcher crashed due to no neighbor graph in the pose Integration test change expected in inverse_rotamer_remodel test due to minor tracer output change

...


branch: master 「№58585」
Commited by: Sergey Lyskov
GitHub commit link: 「5cc3c494bbf69f3d」 「№1228」
Difference from previous tested commit:  code diff
Commit date: 2016-03-27 19:46:21

Merge pull request #1228 from RosettaCommons/sergey/binder Fixing various PyRosetta compilation issues

...


branch: master 「№58584」
Commited by: Vikram K. Mulligan
GitHub commit link: 「f2de45a2fc4dfcbb」 「№1227」
Difference from previous tested commit:  code diff
Commit date: 2016-03-26 12:04:08

Merge pull request #1227 from RosettaCommons/vmullig/cyclic_packing_bug Fix a bug in packing cyclic peptides when using beta_nov15 There's an MxN array that should be an NxM array, which throws a debug assertion error. Tasks: -- Add unit test to illustrate/catch the problem. -- Figure out what's causing the problem. -- Fix it. -- Beauty. Update: I think the problem was that a particular array was being set up that was intended to be NxM, where N is the number of rotamers for residue i and M is the number of rotamers for residue j, and i is strictly less than j. (This was for bonded pairs of residues). In the cyclic peptide case, at the cyclization point, i was greater than j, and the NxM matrix had the dimensions swapped. I've added logic to check whether i or j is greater and to swap the indices accordingly.

...


branch: master 「№58583」
Commited by: Tom Linsky
GitHub commit link: 「c1b2500478675014」 「№1225」
Difference from previous tested commit:  code diff
Commit date: 2016-03-25 22:42:07

Merge pull request #1225 from RosettaCommons/tlinsky/residuevector Add ResidueVector to convert from ResidueSubset to vector of resids

...


branch: master 「№58582」
Commited by: Frank DiMaio
GitHub commit link: 「6e3be0218cc86bca」 「№1223」
Difference from previous tested commit:  code diff
Commit date: 2016-03-24 21:50:58

Merge pull request #1223 from RosettaCommons/dimaio/twod_lattice_fixes A few bugfixes for MakeLayerMover (2D tiling code)

...


branch: master 「№58581」
Commited by: Jared Adolf-Bryfogle
GitHub commit link: 「e84d5d9a1ef9aa60」 「№1222」
Difference from previous tested commit:  code diff
Commit date: 2016-03-24 21:23:32

Merge pull request #1222 from RosettaCommons/jadolfbr/fix_rsd_copy_op Remove RT copy operation from DisulfideAtomIndices Fix ResidueType access in DisulfideAtomIndices where we are getting an actual copy of the residue type from a residue instead of a const reference as we should be. This should speed up code a little bit when doing much residue deletion and additions. Identified by the Time Profiler instrument on a mac during carbohydrate glycosylation profiling. If you have a mac, and want to profile code (number of calls/time spent in particular places, etc.), its super awesome and easy to setup.

...


< 1 .. 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 .. 354 >

Legend:
queued Queued Test
queued for comparison Test finished running but not yet compared
running Test is Running right now
comparing Test results is now comparing with previous results
finished Test is finished without errors
failed Test failed
build Failed Test could not be run because build failed
script failed Test results is unknow because test-script failed
canceled Test was canceled